The Math: Weekly vs Monthly Premium
Let's use AAPL at $190 with a 0.25 delta call:
Weekly (7 DTE):
Monthly (30 DTE):
Weeklies win on raw premium by about 50% more annualized income. But this comparison ignores real-world friction.
Real-World Costs That Erode Weekly Profits
Transaction costs: 52 trades/year vs 12. Even at $0 commission, the bid-ask spread costs you $0.03-$0.10 per contract per trade. Over 52 trades: $1.56-$5.20 per year in spread costs. Over 12 trades: $0.36-$1.20.
Wider relative spreads on weeklies: Weekly options often have wider bid-ask spreads as a percentage of premium. A $1.20 weekly might have a $0.10 spread (8.3% slippage). A $3.40 monthly might have a $0.12 spread (3.5% slippage).
Management time: Rolling, monitoring, and closing 52 positions per year is significant work compared to 12.
Gap risk: Every Monday through Wednesday, your weekly call can get blown through by overnight news. Monthly calls spread this risk across more days.
After Friction: Adjusted Comparison
| Factor | Weekly | Monthly |
Weeklies still win, but the gap narrows from 53% to 45%. And this doesn't factor in the value of your time.
When Weeklies Make Sense
When Monthlies Make Sense
The 45 DTE Sweet Spot
Many professional option sellers use 45 DTE (days to expiration) as their default. It sits between weekly and monthly and offers:
With 45 DTE, you get roughly 8-9 cycles per year instead of 12 or 52. The premium per cycle is higher, and the management burden is lower.
OptionsPilot displays premium yield across all available expirations so you can compare weekly, monthly, and 45-DTE options side by side for any stock.
My Recommendation
Start with monthly (30 DTE) covered calls. Get comfortable with the mechanics, management, and psychology. After 6 months, if you want more income and can handle the workload, try weeklies on one position. Compare your actual results — including all friction costs — before switching your whole portfolio.