Structure Comparison
Iron Condor (4 different strikes):
Iron Butterfly (short strikes at same price):
The butterfly's short put and short call share the same strike — right at the money. The condor's short strikes are spread apart, creating a wider profit zone.
Side-by-Side Numbers
Assume MSFT is trading at $150:
| Metric | Iron Condor | Iron Butterfly |
The Core Trade-Off
The iron condor has a wider profit zone but collects less premium. You win more often, but each win is smaller.
The iron butterfly has a narrower profit zone but collects much more premium. You win less often, but winning trades are significantly more profitable.
When to Use Each
Use an iron condor when:
Use an iron butterfly when:
Management Differences
Iron condor management is relatively hands-off. The stock can drift 5-10 points and you're still profitable. Most traders set a profit target (50% of credit) and a stop loss (2× credit) and let it play out.
Iron butterfly management requires more attention. Even a 3-point move from the center strike starts eroding your edge. Many butterfly traders close at 25% of max profit rather than 50%, because the probability of reaching 50% is lower.
The Hybrid Approach
Some traders use a broken iron condor where the short strikes are only $2-3 apart instead of the typical $5-10. This creates a structure between a condor and butterfly — more premium than a wide condor, wider profit zone than a butterfly.
Example on MSFT at $150:
This hybrid works well when you're mildly confident about a price range but want some buffer on each side.
Bottom Line
For most traders, especially those running monthly income strategies, the iron condor is the more practical choice. The higher win rate is psychologically easier to handle, and the wider profit zone means fewer management headaches. Iron butterflies are a specialist tool — powerful when conditions align, but too narrow for everyday use.